Alex Rybakov vs Billy Suarez Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• In second serve effectiveness over the past six months, Rybakov leads with a win rate of 47.51%, compared to Suarez's 41.64%. Could this mean Rybakov has the edge in serve consistency?
• When it comes to breaking their opponent's second serves, Rybakov is marginally better, securing 45.55% of these points against Suarez's 44.68%. This suggests Rybakov might have a slight advantage in return games.
• Rybakov shows resilience under pressure, saving 54.94% of breakpoints, while Suarez saves 48.1%. Is Rybakov's ability to fend off crucial points a significant factor?
• Both players show a strong match-winning capacity over the last year, with Rybakov having a 69.35% win rate and Suarez at 68%. Is Rybakov's slight winning edge a deciding factor?
• Rybakov performs best on indoor hard courts with a 63% win rate, whereas Suarez excels on hard courts boasting a 69% winning percentage. Could surface preference play a role in this match?
• Rybakov has experience at a slightly higher competitive level, regularly competing in Challengers/ITF tournaments (> $10K level). Meanwhile, Suarez primarily competes in Futures/Satellites/ITF events ($10K level). Does this experience give Rybakov a competitive advantage?
• When facing tougher opponents, Suarez had an average opposition rank of 175.7, much higher than Rybakov's average of 387.82. Does Suarez's experience against stronger competition influence match predictions?
• In deciding sets, Rybakov has a higher win rate of 58%, in comparison to Suarez's 50%. Could this hint that Rybakov might perform better in a close match situation?
• Suarez has a better break point conversion rate at 39.53% while Rybakov stands at 29.44%. Is Suarez's ability to seize break opportunities a potential game-changer?

Editorial Prediction (June 19, 2025, UTC):

Rybakov and Suarez display solid form in their respective strengths. Rybakov demonstrates consistency in second serves and resilience under pressure by saving more breakpoints, which may give him an edge in maintaining service games.

Conversely, Suarez showcases a remarkable ability to convert breakpoints, suggesting he could capitalize on any service lapses by Rybakov.

Suarez's experience against higher-ranked opponents might provide insight into handling Rybakov's competitive playstyle, potentially making the match tightly contested.

Given these factors, Rybakov is projected as the likely winner due to his stronger second serve performance and breakpoint-saving capability, although Suarez's breakpoint conversion rate could prove pivotal if exploited effectively.